|
Post by NovaStorm on Nov 17, 2014 16:42:49 GMT
Plus Serena wasn't a childhood friend in the first place, effectively making this theory a FALSE ANALOGY. It's just not 100% equally comparable, that's all. The crush is comparable, the "during the time of childhood" is comparable, just not the friendship part.
|
|
|
Post by (Banned) on Nov 17, 2014 17:09:30 GMT
Plus Serena wasn't a childhood friend in the first place, effectively making this theory a FALSE ANALOGY. It's just not 100% equally comparable, that's all. The crush is comparable, the "during the time of childhood" is comparable, just not the friendship part. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effectThe Childhood friend rhetoric you guys showed me relies on the Westermarck effect. Serena doesn't fit that definition.
|
|
|
Post by NovaStorm on Nov 17, 2014 17:31:41 GMT
Isn't the Westermarck effect something you would want Serena to have since it is about attraction? Besides, the effect can apply to everyone since journeying equals close proximity.
|
|
|
Post by (Banned) on Nov 17, 2014 17:42:20 GMT
Isn't the Westermarck effect something you would want Serena to have since it is about attraction? Besides, the effect can apply to everyone since journeying equals close proximity. "The Westermarck effect, or reverse sexual imprinting, is a hypothetical psychological effect through which people who live in close domestic proximity during the first few years of their lives become desensitized to sexual attraction." No. It does the opposite.
|
|
|
Post by (Banned) on Nov 17, 2014 17:53:04 GMT
Isn't the Westermarck effect something you would want Serena to have since it is about attraction? Besides, the effect can apply to everyone since journeying equals close proximity. "The Westermarck effect, or reverse sexual imprinting, is a hypothetical psychological effect through which people who live in close domestic proximity during the first few years of their lives become desensitized to sexual attraction." No. It does the opposite. Oh,a dn you guys do realize int he Amourshipping talk page at Bulbapedia, that the frivolous hints needed to be taken out (and they have). Take a look yourself. bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Shipping_talk:AmourShippingExample (from the talk page) I have noticed continuously that people keep adding things that are not really "hints". These things keep getting added although they are not AmourShipping hints at all, and I am a huge AmourShipping so it's not like I am saying this because I don't like the ship or anything. Please stop as it is getting really annoying. Examples: As Ash follows Bonnie down to an Ursaring, Serena says "What are you doing?", applying that she thought Ash was walking into danger. -> Asking a question (and in the dub no less) means nothing. There is a difference between general concern and a "shippy" reaction of concern. Learn the difference. After Hawlucha lands a Flying Press on Ash, Serena has a shocked expression on her face and runs to him in concern (although this was the group's general reaction). -> The fact that it is the group's general reaction does NOT make this an AmourShipping hint. And I completely agree with him. You guys should add your hints to Bulbapedia. If they get removed, ask why on the talk page. Anyone can edit it (WIKI)!
|
|
|
Post by satohika on Aug 31, 2016 21:27:22 GMT
Serena's crush on Ash is canon. But trying to find Ash hints is like grasping for straws. The only girl that Ash saw interest in is still Dawn but they're both romantically dense.
|
|